AI tools don't care about your privacy.
Okay, this phrase is just to grab your attention, but there is some truth to it…
In practice, AI and privacy often clash: tools are useful, but the data trail is real.
ChatGPT, Gemini, and other language models process enormous amounts of data and collect your queries and responses by default for their own purposes.
For example, OpenAI openly admits that it stores all your interactions with ChatGPT and may use them to train models. It's no surprise that Apple has banned ChatGPT for its employees to avoid information leaks.
But is there any way to limit the data we provide to AI? Can we even dream of AI and privacy? This guide is about staying AI private without losing the benefits of modern tools.
The term “private AI” can be understood in different ways.
From a user’s perspective, being AI private means your inputs stay confidential. It is not transferred to third parties, is not reused without your consent, and will not appear anywhere else later.
The ideal private AI assistant is one that works locally or in isolation, without sending your questions to external servers. An example would be a model such as Llama 2 or another open-source model running on your computer or server. This way, all calculations and reasoning take place on your device, and not a single line of your data leaks to external clouds.
From the developer’s side, data privacy in AI depends on logging, encryption, and retention Private AI involves the implementation of special techniques to protect personal data.
More often than not, “private AI” simply refers to a service that promises to strictly protect your data and not use it for its own purposes.
For example, some companies release paid corporate versions of AI services where customer data is isolated and does not go into the general training pool. There, you will definitely see a note that the service does not use data from your workspace to train its models.
If a service can’t explain data privacy in AI, it’s not really AI private.
There is no such thing as absolute AI privacy as long as personal data leaves your device. There will always be at least a slight distrust of how the provider will handle your information.
If you care about AI and privacy, you need to understand where your prompts end up
You can track the path of the data and determine where the risk of leakage lies:
We often reveal too much ourselves. Users can enter company secrets, personal data, passwords, and source code into chatbots.
This is one of the most overlooked parts of AI and privacy.
Your request travels across the network to the AI server. The connection is usually encrypted (HTTPS), and no outsider can eavesdrop on its contents in transit.
However, metadata (for example, that you accessed such a service) may be visible to your provider or employer.
If you use any intermediaries (e.g., VPN, proxy servers, corporate gateways), make sure they can be trusted.
This is where it gets interesting. Your request goes to the company (OpenAI, Google, Microsoft, it doesn't matter), and their system generates a response.
First, the request and the response are almost certainly logged, at least temporarily stored in a database.
Second, they may end up in the monitoring system: automatic filters check the content for violations (prohibited topics) and may flag the conversation for manual review.
Third, the model itself may store your message in short-term memory for context.
Here, we are entirely dependent on the company's policy. That’s why data privacy in AI isn’t abstract.
Many services store your query history so that you can return to it. For example, ChatGPT stores all your chats indefinitely by default (until you delete them yourself). This data is stored on the company's servers and may be backed up or duplicated.
The question of data storage duration is one of the key issues: some services promise to delete or anonymize your data after X days.
If data is stored for a long time, there is always a risk of leakage: a bug, hacking, a dishonest employee, or even simple human error.
Many AI companies use user data to retrain and improve their models. This means that your questions and answers may end up in the next hypothetical GPT-6 as a training example.
Your information gets mixed into the model weights, and you can no longer remove it, even by deleting your history. The model has already learned from it. And there is a risk that the model can then reproduce fragments of this data to someone else.
It is rare for a request to be processed entirely within a single organization. Services engage contractors and subcontractors. Some provide hosting, some help catch toxic content, and some analyze usage metrics.
AI privacy policies usually have a section on data transfer to third parties. That's where you need to look.
Even if your data is not shared with third parties, it can still be read by employees or contractors of the AI provider itself.
For example, OpenAI employs specially trained moderators who review individual dialogues to flag undesirable content or improve the model's responses.
Google also says that some conversations (not linked to an account) may be stored for up to three years and analyzed by humans to improve the quality and safety of AI.
The final stage of the data journey is when you or the company decides to delete it. Unfortunately, in practice, deletion is not always absolute.
Not all services provide a convenient way to delete your history or account.
Even deleted chats often remain in backup copies for some time. OpenAI, for example, deletes chats from visible history immediately when they are manually deleted, but only completely erases them from its servers after up to 30 days.
An AI privacy policy is the fastest way to verify what the company really does with your data.
Check these points. They almost always resolve everything related to AI and privacy:
A good AI privacy policy makes data privacy in ai measurable: retention, training, access, and deletion.
A simple chat with AI is one thing. But today, AI is increasingly being integrated into various work processes, linked to applications, and given access to emails, files, and tasks. Agents are emerging that browse the internet and services for us. All of this greatly increases efficiency, but the risks to privacy also increase many times over.
There are several things to consider in AI automation with data privacy:
We would say that using AI agents means entrusting them with almost all of your data. This can hardly be called private AI.
When connecting AI to your systems, don't forget about the network level. Sometimes, for smart automation, people connect third-party proxy services or bots that act as intermediaries between your application and the AI platform.
As usual, avoid intermediaries that you don't trust 100%.
Network privacy also concerns anonymity. If it's important not to reveal your IP or location when accessing AI, use trusted proxies, VPNs, or corporate gateways.
You already know who to contact for proxies. Here you can choose a suitable proxy plan.
Yes, it is possible to communicate with AI while maintaining privacy. A private AI chat is realistic only when your prompts don’t leave your control.
The most reliable way is to use local models. This is when you download (or train yourself) a language model and run it on your computer or server. No external company will receive your prompts. That’s the practical side of AI and privacy that need some skills.
The second option is companies that focus on AI privacy as an advantage. For example, OpenAI has released ChatGPT Enterprise, which states that no user data is used for training, and that history is encrypted and stored in isolated environments.
In fact, AI privacy is determined by the final destination of data storage. If your request is still stored somewhere on an OpenAI or Google server (even without your name), you cannot claim complete confidentiality.
Finally, here is a list of practical tips to protect data privacy in AI day to day: